Thursday, 12 March 2009

Discussion about Life and Beyond

I don't know if its only me or its everybody; that tries to figure out the content of life. But it consumes me. If there is no life, there will be no civilization. If there is no civilization, there will be no technology, and no technology mean the Earth is safe, for we will not want anything else other than the food that we need to eat for that day.

I saw foolishness under sun that man does. They build a city, and yet they need a fridge to store food so that they don't go hungry. Yet, the man in the forest have food in abundant and no fridge can accommodate them. If food is more important than shelter, why built a city?

What can we do to save our self? Some said get a salvation. But that is to me just a theoretical approach to saving our self. Believe in science? I am drawn more towards that. Either way, the Earth is going down and so far, it is too late to save it. Man save their life too much until the Earth is ignored. If the Earth is going down, it will drag everybody, sinner or non-sinner to their end.

Man contain the life, therefore he protect them. The Earth contain the life of the man, that is why Earth protect them. But when Man's life is in danger, somebody cures them. When Earth is in danger, who is going to cure them?

I see everything as a fractal. Life is just a small piece of fractal pattern attached to a greater fractal. The smaller piece of fractal will be destroyed as soon as one small component of the equation of the bigger fractal is changed.

Yet, man thinks that salvation of their soul is more important than the Earth. I don't understand.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

you seem very confused mostly about religion... as throughout your writing, i think 70% of them are either your confusion about religion or it is just a way for you to provoke others. Only you know :)

New Age Thinker said...

Nope, I am not confused about religion. I understand it perfectly! I think you should check yourself. Do you understand your religion or you just 'being in a religion'? Clearly you can't differentiate between the mind who understand religion and the mind who is not. But I don't blame you, some mind just can't think beyond.

I would like you to think! and I certainly would not like to provoke. But if you feel provoked, I say good!