Eskimo Wolf Hunter

Here is how an Eskimo hunts Wolf for their nice furry skin. An Eskimo hunter hunts a a rabbit, a seal, or anything easy to catch red blooded animal. The hunter have a two-edged sword which he will use to slaughter the animal. He will dip the blade into the animal blood, creating a very thin coat of blood, and then letting the blood to freeze. He dip the blade again, creating another coat of thin layer blood. He probably do that several time.

The Eskimo will then put the blade strongly anchored to the ground with the blade pointing straight up. Pack of wolf, attracted to the smell of blood will come to the blade, starts licking the blood. Because the blood is frozen, eventually the wolf's tongue become frozen numb. The wolf kept on licking until the blood coating on the blade all licked by the wolf and for every lick, the blade start to cut through the wolf's tongue, and starts bleeding. Because the tongue is numbed, the wolf does not feel a thing. When the tongue starts to bleed, the wolf starts to feel warm blood, and gets more excited, and lick the blade faster. The more it licks, the more cut and more blood. Eventually the wolf stops when it feel the pain.

The wolf will then die bleeding.

Because of Passion and Lust, man and woman will eventually will end up like the wolf.

The Paradox

One stormy night in 1945, out of nowhere, a guy came out of the darkness carrying a baby to an orphanage door. The nun saw that fine little girl and decided to keep her and called her Jane. Jane grew up wondering who was her father, mother, sisters, brothers. One day, when Jane was 19 years old, she fell in love with a handsome young man. It is a love at first sight. However, things does not really goes well between them, they quarrel every night, and the boyfriend stormed into the night, leaving Jane alone and pregnant. One night, Jane was rushed to the hospital to deliver a fine little baby girl. That night, somebody broke the window and snatched the baby away. The doctor found out that Jane was bleeding abnormally and did an operation on her and turned her into Jim. Jane woke up next morning just to find that she is no more Jane. She said to herself, I was left in an orphanage as a baby, grew up as Jane, had a baby who was kidnapped from the hospital and now I am not even Jane anymore, I am Jim... He gets into fist fight every time somebody asked him who is he, where is he from, who was his parents.. One day Jim was so drunk and slept in the bar. The bartender came up to Jim and said 'Jim, wake up.. I am not really a bar tender, I am a time traveler, come into my machine and we will find out who is your mother, father, brother, sisters..'. Jim went way back in time, and found a young 19 years old girl and it was love at first sight. However, things didn't went well between, they quarrel every night, and Jim stormed into the night, leaving his girlfriend. Then Jim get to know that his girlfriend was pregnant, wanted to give the baby the best education possible, he went to the hospital, break the window and snatch the baby away. He went into the time machine and he go back..back..way back in time, and the year was 1945, it was a stormy night, Jim went to an orphanage and put his baby on the orphanage doorstep. The nun saw that fine little baby and called her Jane. Jane grew up wondering who was her mother, father, sister, brother....

Who is Jane's Father and mother?

Misinterpretion

I was ROFL when I saw somebody commented on facebook that CHRISTIAN is a religion. Little we know that the moslems also saying that islam is a religion. But little we know that the original intention of the usage of the word is totally different. Christians and moslems thought that jews is a religion too! Worst, they thought Judaism is also religion and theology. I think even the jews themselves will not admit that because judaism is their way of life. Just the moslems claims that islam is a way of life. And originally, the word christian is referring to people whose life follows christ (in a way, it is a way of life too). At least the jews preserved their original state of definition, moslems and particularly christians totally deluded. Little they know that christian are made a religion by the romans conqurers. enhanced the religion with flashy building and elaborate ceremony. and now, if anybody asked where christianity comes from, they will say from GOD. I am gonna ROFL again.

Is it important to know the origin of christianity? Oo yes. Imagine a car, made to ease travelling, used by an idiot as a roof of a house. Look techie, but darn idiot.

-::TheNewAgeThinker::-

Extended Solomon Proverbs

Man died when he stops thinking.



-::TheNewAgeThinker::-

Wrong Axiom?

Consider this:

Given that

1+x > 2-y ...........(1)

where {x,y} is between {0..1},

intuitively the statement can be rewritten in equality as

1+x+z = 2-y ...........(2)

where z is some constant satisfying 0 < z < 1. Now, rearranging (2) we have

x+y+z = 2-1
x+y+z = 1 ...............(3)

Since z is a constant, the only variables are x and y.

1. Now, pick an arbitrary x and y satisfying condition (1) and assume z constant, and apply the same x and y to (3). Statements (1) and (3) does not agree.

2. Now, pick an arbitrary x and y satisfying condition (3) and assume z constant, and apply the same x and y to (1). Statement (3) and (1) does not agree as well.

Conclusion:

The axiom 'K > M can be written as (K+x)=M' fails for {K,M} between {0..1}

-::TheNewAgeThinker::-

Why Philosophy is Difficult for some people

The reasons are:

1. They don't think
2. They don't think that + reason (1)
3. They don't think that + reason (2)

Front view is incomplete until we see the rear view, and the sides. Some choose just the front view because it always beautiful.

-:: TheNewAgeThinker::-

Philosophy of the DOER

Can it be that there can be no instructor for the doer to do what need to be done? Is it possible that the doer himself is the instructor? And is it possible for something completed to be completed by the doer without any instruction to do it? Suppose that an instructor is required by the doer; If an instructor is also the doer, it is impossible for the doer to to without instruction, and if the doer is not willing, the instructor contradict himself for being the doer at the same time.